HRMG 720 RTW Laws and Janus Discussion Questions
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
HRMG 720 RTW Laws and Janus Discussion Questions
I’m working on a business law discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Using the Discussion Board Rubric listed below for the specific grading criteria, develop an initial response to the following: As of 2018 there are 28 ‘Right to Work’ states, the most recent being Michigan, Indiana, Wisconsin, West Virginia, Kentucky and Missouri (all since 2012). In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court recently decided Janus v. AFSCME Council 31 (June 27, 2018) which held that a public employer’s withholding of union dues, under an agency fee arrangement and without the employee’s individual consent, is unlawful because it compels the individual to financially subsidize the speech of a union. Thus, unauthorized agency fee deductions violate the First Amendment and are unconstitutional. American workers still have all rights under the NLRA to organize unions and engage in protected, concerted activities. However, the impact of both Right to Work laws and Supreme Court’s Janus decision (for public sector unions) have the potential to severely decrease the amount of dues being paid to unions from workers.
Based on your academic analysis, what impact will these RTW laws and Janus have on the union movement?
Based on your academic analysis, how does member dues funding impact workplace labor relations?
Based on your academic analysis, what is the practical effect of defunding unions and their ability to staff and service members through local union administration?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow