Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Instructions
Assignment Overview and Directions:
Using your organization, or one you are familiar with, you will identify your knowledge of HRIS and to make a suggestion about a new piece of technology for each of the weekly learning objectives for HRMT415 for Weeks 2-6. It could be one piece of technology that brings these all together or you might have a suggestion for each. For clarification, these topics were discussed in the course for Weeks 2-6:
The topics for Weeks 2 through 6 are as follows:
1) Week 2 – eRecruiting and eSelection
2) Week 4 – Self-Service and HR Portals
3) Week 5 – eLearning and Training
4) Week 6 – Performance Management
Each of these topics should be about one page in length responding to the assignment objective, i.e. make a suggestion about a new piece of technology for each of the weekly learning objectives. In some cases, it might be an integrated system – where it is one program that fulfills each element.
You should also share the requirements that must be considered in relation to each of the decisions that you make as well as your rationale for the recommendation. A good place to find information for this assignment is the online APUS library and on the SHRM website. This paper will require you to research HRIS technology.
The following will help guide you through the mechanics of the paper:
· Utilize the APA Style for preparing your paper.
· The “body” of the paper will be no less than 5 pages
· Your title page, abstract, references, and any attachments are not include in the page count.
· Your abstract is a brief, comprehensive summary of the content of a paper. The abstract goes on a page by itself and precedes the actual paper.
· Your introduction will provide an opportunity to capture the reader’s attention with a “hook.” It also indicates what the paper will be about and how you will approach the topic.
· Your conclusion will summarize the main idea, ties the main points together neatly for the reader, and ends with a sense of finality. Avoid introducing new ideas in the conclusion.
· Save your paper as Last Name_Week4_HRMT415.doc (e.g. Smith_Week8_HRMT415.doc).
· I encourage you use, at a minimum, the word processing software’s grammar and spell check, making the necessary corrections before submitting as punctuation, essay format (thesis, supporting paragraphs with transition and topic sentences, and summary) grammar, and documentation count toward your grade.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analyze the Water Footprint Results