HS 450 Strategic Planning and Economic Discussion

HS 450 Strategic Planning and Economic Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

HS 450 Strategic Planning and Economic Discussion

Part 1

Instructions

Develop a change management project to outsource the new employee onboarding process for your health care organization. Summarize the hypothetical details you would implement and apply a change management model. Describe the anticipated impact on employee motivation, productivity, and satisfaction and how any challenges will be addressed.

Part 2

Instructions

Evaluate one of the ethical rules listed in the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) Code of Ethics applying the rule specifically to the onboarding process.

Part 3

Instructions

Write a 1,000-word speech informing the CEO of your project, including all elements for a successful implementation for approval.

Criterion 1: Develop a change management project.

Meet all 3 of the following criteria.
?    Summarize the
hypothetical details you would implement to outsource the new employee onboarding process.
?    Explains the chosen change management model.
?    Explains how you would apply a change management model to a project.

Criterion 2: Outsourcing of an onboarding process

Discuss the process of outsourcing the new employee onboarding process for your health care organization using more than 2 examples to ease the anticipated change.

Criterion 3: Impact of Change and the Challenges

Meet all 3 of the following criteria.
?    Describes the anticipated impact on employee motivation and how any challenges will be addressed.
?    Describes the anticipated impact on productivity and how any challenges will be addressed.
?    Describes the anticipated satisfaction and how any challenges will be addressed.

Criterion 4: Application of the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) Code of Ethics

Evaluates one of the ethical rules listed in the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) Code of Ethics specifically to the onboarding process, providing more than one example.

Criterion 5: Speech requirements

Includes at least four or more references. All references follow APA format. At least a 1,000 words speech represents a conference call informing the CEO of your project, including all elements for a successful implementation for approval.

HS450_2105C_-5: Evaluate change management principles and models for their impacts on employee motivation, productivity, and job satisfaction.

Student work demonstrates the ability to evaluate change management principles and models and expound on their impacts specific to employee motivation, productivity, and job satisfaction. Apply a model for hospital-physicians integration and discuss the advantages and disadvantages for hospitals and physicians under this model applying multiple examples.

GEL-7.05: Evaluate the ethical rules applicable to [insert topic or field of practice/study].

Student work demonstrates the ability to evaluate the logic and significance of ethical rules applicable to the student’s field of practice or study using sound reasoning in a clear presentation of ethical reasoning.

HS 450 Strategic Planning and Economic Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!