Human perception and cognitive biases
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Human perception and cognitive biases
Human perception is the process by which we interpret and make sense of the world around us. It involves a complex interplay between our senses, our cognitive processes, and our prior experiences. However, our perception is not always accurate or objective, as we are prone to cognitive biases that can distort our understanding of reality.
Cognitive biases are systematic errors in thinking that can affect our judgment, decision-making, and behavior. They arise from our brain’s need to simplify and make sense of the vast amounts of information it receives, but they can also result from our personal experiences, cultural upbringing, and social environment. Here are some examples of common cognitive biases:
Confirmation bias: This is the tendency to seek out information that confirms our pre-existing beliefs and ignore or dismiss information that contradicts them. It can lead to a narrow-minded view of the world and prevent us from considering alternative perspectives.
Availability heuristic: This bias occurs when we rely on the most easily accessible information to make decisions or judgments. For example, we may overestimate the likelihood of rare events like plane crashes because they are more salient in our memory than common events like car accidents.
Anchoring bias: This is the tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information we receive when making decisions. For example, if we are asked to estimate the value of a house, our estimate may be influenced by the initial asking price rather than the actual market value.
Sunk cost fallacy: This is the tendency to continue investing time, money, or resources into a project or decision because of the resources already invested, even if it no longer makes rational sense. For example, a business owner may continue to invest in a failing project because they have already invested a significant amount of money in it.
Hindsight bias: This is the tendency to believe that we would have predicted an event after it has occurred, even if we had no prior knowledge or evidence to support our prediction. It can lead to overconfidence in our ability to predict the future and underestimate the role of chance.
These are just a few examples of the many cognitive biases that can affect our perception and decision-making. They are not always harmful, as they can sometimes help us make quick and efficient judgments. However, they can also lead to errors in judgment, discrimination, and prejudice.
To overcome cognitive biases, we need to be aware of their existence and actively work to counteract them. This can involve seeking out diverse perspectives, questioning our assumptions, and being open to new information that challenges our beliefs. It also requires a willingness to be introspective and acknowledge our own biases, which can be uncomfortable but is necessary for personal growth and learning.
In conclusion, human perception is a complex and dynamic process that is susceptible to cognitive biases. These biases can distort our understanding of reality and lead to errors in judgment and decision-making. To overcome them, we need to be aware of their existence and actively work to counteract them through critical thinking, openness to new information, and self-reflection.
Human perception and cognitive biases
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow