hyperboarder article and video sharing review

June 7, 2021

hyperboarder article and video sharing review

Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10

Instructions:

All papers need to include references and be written in APA format o Refer to https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ for APA formatting standards.
All papers must include a well-designed cover page with document title, due date, date turned in, student name, year of schooling, name of institution, class name, instructor name;
Students MUST include a formal table of contents/outline (following cover page) of your document using APA format.
Refer to The Path to Writing a Professional Document within Blackboard for crucial tips to improve your documents.
Chapter 3: Reactions to the Hyperborder (Politics);
o 2 pages minimum
o Formal paper using APA format, include source
o Cover page
o Instructions continued on next page
Write a summary of the article/video you are sharing, so that you may give an informed summary to the class before you present your piece. Within the paper, discuss the sociology concepts from Chapter 3: Reactions to the Hyperborder which relate to your topic. Also, use your sociological perspective to reveal your personal thoughts about the subject.
Load the internet link/presentation on your computer before class begins.
o the student will give a short introduction to the current event video/article/news piece with an explanation of how it relates to what we are studying using specific concepts as examples.
o student will give their sociological perspective on the subject, pose a good question
Your grade will be based on
Introduced issue well: 10 points
Quality of writing: 10 points
Critical thinking applied: 10 points
All instructions followed ( 2 full written pages (not including title, outline or reference pages): 10 points
Cover page aesthetics and includes all required elements: 10 points
Outline quality: 10 points
APA style applied correctly to body of paper and reference page: 10 points
Spelling and grammar: 10 points
Critical thinking applied (mostly apparent in the conclusion): 10 points
Good introduction and conclusion: 10 points
All questions addressed: 10 points
Good use of quality maps and images relating directly to the written discussions 10 points
High quality sources (3 minimum sources): 10 points

hyperboarder article and video sharing review

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

hyperboarder article and video sharing review

hyperboarder article and video sharing review