Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Ikea Vs Culture of Sustainability Corporate Sustainability Report
What I need is only a basic idea of what you would like to do about this project!
For this project you will think critically about how our learnings apply to some aspect of communicating sustainability. Opportunities for this project include:
-evaluating the Corporate Sustainability Report of a large company (NOT Patagonia!)
-a project comparing sustainability / ecolabels – one you believe to be good, and one you believe to be bad / incorrect / wrong /weak (and what is the difference between the two)
-Identifying a sustainability issue and how this topic is covered by left, center, and right leaning news outlets.
-Twitter project – track sustainability discussion on twitter
Ikea Vs Culture of Sustainability Corporate Sustainability Report
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Ikea Vs Culture of Sustainability Corporate Sustainability Report |
Ikea Vs Culture of Sustainability Corporate Sustainability Report