immigration exradition policy discussion essay 1

May 24, 2021

immigration exradition policy discussion essay

Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10

Instructions:

immigration exradition policy discussion essay

Extradition Policy
You are an immigration officer assigned to the anti-terrorist investigative squad. The squad’s mission is to maintain a list of known terrorists and terrorist organizations. Part of your duties is preparing intelligence reports on information supplied to you by your counterparts, immigration officers in Canada and Mexico, regarding illegal alien terrorists entering their countries and destined to attempt to enter the U.S. You have been given the task of comparing and contrasting the US extradition concepts relating to illegal alien terrorists in a report to your foreign counterparts and your supervisor.
Create a presentation of 5 to 7 slides in Microsoft PowerPoint, which includes the following:
Explain the different statute(s) and procedures that pertain to the US extradition laws relating only to illegal alien terrorists.
Analyze who should detain the terrorist(s)Canada, Mexico, or the U.S. Why?
What are the extradition treaty issues that need to be resolved, and how can they be resolved?
Do terrorists held in exclusion proceedings have constitutional due process rights? Why or why not?
Would it be possible not to extradite an illegal alien terrorist to Canada or Mexico? How? What extradition concept or statute does this possibility refer to?
In your opinion, explain, with reasoning, one way to change the current US extradition policy to make the extradition of illegal alien terrorists less complex (faster and easier).
Support your responses with examples.
Cite any sources in APA format.

immigration exradition policy discussion essay

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

immigration exradition policy discussion essay