In a retail conglomeration, there is a digital service solution

July 15, 2021

In a retail conglomeration, there is a digital service

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

In a retail conglomeration, there is a digital service

The paper’s outline

In the draft paper, I included my outline (for you to look at)

However, for the order, only the “literature review” section is required.

Please follow my outline for the literature review. If you have a better idea, please let me know first.)

Define the research’s important terminology (for example, (service) quality, digital services, digital service quality, retail agglomerations, etc.).
When did digital services first appear, and how did they do so?

How can you determine the quality of a digital service? What constitutes a good digital service and what constitutes a terrible one?
Identify and describe key conceptual models (e.g., the models of retail attractiveness and digital service quality…)

-The model on the next slide (I discovered another one, though I’m not sure whether it’s the right one: I’ll upload the reading.) At least two models should be used (briefly describle the one from professor and use the one I found or you can find

another one)
What are the advantages of digital services for retail agglomerations/shopping malls/stores?

Other researchers’ (empirical) findings should be reported: What did they learn about your research topic from them? What do we know and what do we don’t?

Include at least 20 references; start with the ones provided by the lecturer (the model on the following slide) and then dig further.

Make the majority of your references academic!

Professor’s directions are underlined and must not be overlooked.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met