Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
India’s International Strategy Case Study of the China Puzzle
What is the secret to CUMI’s success? Is it long-term viable? What portion of it can be transferred internationally?
2. What motivates CUMI’s internationalization efforts? Analyze the drivers at the industry level as well as at the country level (India)?
3. Evaluate CUMI’s ventures in Russia and South Africa. What is the amount of success in each of these two marketplaces, and what factors do you think are responsible for their success or failure?
4. How would you rate CUMI’s performance in China? What exactly is CUMI’s issue in China? Why do you think CUMI hasn’t been able to replicate its success in Russia in China?
5. What is the significance of China to CUMI? Is the management thinking about a China-centric strategy correctly?
6. What possibilities does CUMI have in China? What is your recommendation for CUMI’s China strategy? How would you go about putting this into action?
India’s International Strategy Case Study of the China Puzzle
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
India’s International Strategy Case Study of the China Puzzle |
India’s International Strategy Case Study of the China Puzzle