Infection Control and Training Program for The Healthcare

October 21, 2022

Infection Control and Training Program for The Healthcare

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Infection Control and Training Program for The Healthcare

Broward College Health & Medical Presentation

Criterion 1: Creation of an infection control and training program for the healthcare facility that adheres to rules and regulations for the industry.

Depicts all of the following elements:
● Creates a hypothetical healthcare facility.
● Depicts an Infection control and training program for the facility.
● Includes appropriate rules of facility
● Includes appropriate regulations for the industry.


Criterion 2: Visual depiction of how individuals or groups can impact this process and their role in the process.	● Visually depiction identifies how at least two individuals and two groups can impact this process and their role in the process.	●


Criterion 3: Visual depiction of how the program and training will impact the facility and how success is monitored and measured.	Visual depiction includes all of the following elements: ● How program impacts the facility ● How program impacts the success of the facility ● How the program is monitored and measured.


Criterion 4: PowerPoint includes visually appealing images and presentation is concise and easy to understand and including APA formatting.	PowerPoint includes all of the following elements: ● Title Slide ● Appealing images/Design ● Concise and easy to Understand ● Reference Slide


Criterion 5: Academic references with in-text citations.	● Includes at least three academic references from multiple outside sources and/or course materials as required.


HA415_1904B_-4.1: Explain policymaking and legal process that underpin the individual health care and public health systems.	Student work indicates an advanced ability to explain policymaking and legal process that underpin the individual health care and public health systems.

*Discuss what impact your family has had on your current and future health status.

*Are there health problems you are at higher risk of contracting/being exposed to?

*Are there positive/negative habits you have picked up from being around them?

*Is there information about your family’s health you don’t have that you wish you

DID have? Why or why not?

*Is there information you wish you did NOT know about? Why or why not?

*Did they support you in starting and/or maintaining positive or negative health

habits? (for example, attended all your activities, bought you your first pack of

cigarettes, etc.)

*Are there behaviors you need to change because of what you learned? Why or

why not?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met