Informed Consent in Practice and Research Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Informed Consent in Practice and Research Discussion
Discussion: Informed Consent in Practice and Research
Rosie, 58, volunteers to participate in a research study conducted by the ABC Biomedical Research Imaging Center. The research is examining a new form of mammography screening for women who have multiple
risk factors and have had a least one abnormal screening for breast cancer in the past. The study offers a stipend and free mammography screening to study participants.
Rosie is sitting in a room when the clinician leading the study walks in to discuss informed consent with her. He introduces himself and then starts to explain the new mammography screening and purpose of the
follow-up visits. Rosie stops him midsentence and tells him that she does not need to hear the details of the procedure and that she is sure that everything will turn out fine. The clinician is impressed with the ease
with which the consent was obtained and offers Rosie participation in the study. Rosie enthusiastically agrees to participate, saying she is sure that the clinician will know what is best for her. The clinician smiles and
tells Rosie that a nurse will be in with a research consent for her to sign.
Consider why Rosie may have waived her right to informed consent. Despite her comments, the clinician may want to continue explaining the informed consent process.
Patients must understand their right to receive information about a procedure and that the procedure (or the outcome of the procedure) has risks and burdens, and that data are collected for research purposes.
Medical decision-making can be an extremely challenging experience for patients and their loved ones. Balancing various potential outcomes with levels of risk can be daunting for someone who is also dealing with
the emotional stresses of illness. Gaining the patient’s “true” informed consent is a critical step for health care professionals to ensure that the best decisions can be made.
Post a comprehensive response to the following:
For each scenario, decide if informed consent was obtained properly. If it was, then explain why you think it was. Be specific. If it was not, then explain where in the informed consent process a procedure was not
followed. Be specific.
- For each scenario, explain how you would improve the informed consent process to make sure consent to treat a patient is obtained correctly. Be specific and provide examples.
- Imagine yourself as a health provider (like the providers in the scenarios). What would you do to make sure that informed consent to treat is always done correctly?
Informed Consent in Practice and Research Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow