Ingredients For A Successful Team
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ingredients For A Successful Team
This week’s discussion question is, “What are the three most valuable lessons about employee motivation that you have learned from this chapter? How do you plan to utilize these lessons within an organization you know well?” (Do not simply provide a list; must be an analysis.)
Response Parameters
The initial response to the discussion questions must be 250-350 words in length. APA Format with references to support your claim
Peter Scholtes listed 10 ingredients for a successful team.
Describe the 10 ingredients and give examples of each APA Format.
You are expected to write primarily in your own voice, using paraphrase, summary, and synthesis techniques when integrating information from class and outside sources. Use an author’s exact words only when the language is especially vivid, unique, or needed for technical accuracy. Failure to do so may result in charges of Academic Dishonesty.
Overusing an author’s exact words, such as including block quotations to meet word counts, may lead your readers to conclude that you lack appropriate comprehension of the subject matter or that you are neither an original thinker nor a skillful writer
You must select (2-3) peer-reviewed journal articles (http://lib.fit.edu/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.) to read and analyze. The articles must cover a topic that relates to job satisfaction; consider theories, tools, and techniques to achieve motivation and enhance the work environment. You will take the main points, concepts, or themes from each of these articles and integrate them into one paper.
The review paper should be 3-4 pages in length, 12-point Times New Roman font, and double-spaced. The page count does not include the title page, tables, graphics, or reference pages. Do not submit an abstract. In addition, submit the final copy as a .doc or .pdf. The paper must be in APA format.
Additional Details
The paper is not a literature review and should not be a simple listing of each article. You must use articles from peer-reviewed journals; do not use trade magazines, books, newspapers, and similar. (If you are unfamiliar with what constitutes a peer-reviewed journal article, check within the FIT Evans Library for resources)
Articles cannot be any more than 5 years old. Your articles must contain current and relevant data
Articles must be found within the FIT Evans library databases; not a website (http://lib.fit.edu/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.)
The (2-3) articles must be sourced and cited within the paper
No more than 15% of your paper should be from direct quotes
Your 3-4 page paper must be arranged as a single-read with paragraph transitions. Do not simply discuss each article and paste the discussions together as your paper
All sources must be cited in APA format within the reference page and in-text citations
Submit your paper to the course digital drop box. The paper will be submitted through Turnitin.com to identify plagiarism issues
Some areas of focus for your article review (these are just suggestions):
Why did you select the articles?
What are the reasons for the research?
Concepts that are discussed and how do these relate to your weekly class topic?
Do you agree/disagree with the author’s hypotheses?
Any assumptions within the articles?
Conclusions?
Any additional data you find relevant to the topic
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results