Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Interdisciplinary Collaboration Skills Discussion Assignment
Evaluating Interdisciplinary Collaboration Skills
In order to develop the most effective processes to ensure that primary health care is successful, interdisciplinary collaboration is essential (Petri, 2010). The term interdisciplinary collaboration refers to an interpersonal goal that is unobtainable when professionals act individually (Hickey & Brosnan, 2017). In the healthcare setting, “interprofessional work involving various health and social care professionals who come together regularly to solve problems or provide services” is known as interprofessional collaboration (Hickey & Brosnan, 2017, p. 231).
Hickey and Brosnan (2017) list the following benefits to interprofessional collaboration:
To resolve real-world problems
To resolve complex problems
To provide different perspectives about a problem
To create a comprehensive prospective theory-based hypothesis for research
To develop consensus around clinical definitions and guidelines for complex diseases and conditions
To provide comprehensive services such as health care and health educations (p. 233)
For interdisciplinary collaboration to be effective, each member of the team must share the same vision, goals, and objectives (Petri, 2010). This shared vision, the ability for groups to work together, and lack of interprofessional education could prove to be barriers to interdisciplinary collaboration (Petri, 2010). Having just started in a new unit as a nurse manager, getting to know the team members of each discipline and learning the details of the vision and current quality improvement initiatives is an area of growth for this particular writer.
The findings of a study by Braithwaite et al. (2012) highlighted the barriers that organizations run into when attempting to create a change across an entire organization. In conclusion, while there are always areas for growth, when implemented, interdisciplinary collaboration can improve relatability, interaction, and communication amongst healthcare workers (Braithwaite et al., 2012). This results in increased quality of care and patient safety (Braithwaite et al., 2012).
References
Braithwaite, J., Westbrook, M., Nugus, P., Greenfield, D., Travaglia, J., Runciman, W., & Westbrook, J. (2012). A four year, systems-wide intervention promoting interprofessional
collaboration. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 99-106. Retrieved from Walden University Library Databases
Hickey, J. V., & Brosnan, C. A. (2017). Evaluation of health care quality for DNPs (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Petri, L. (2010). Concept analysis of interdisciplinary collaboration. Nursing Forum, 45(2), 73-82. Retrieved from Walden University Library Databas
APA, 2 references
Interdisciplinary Collaboration Skills Discussion Assignment
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Interdisciplinary Collaboration Skills Discussion Assignment |
Interdisciplinary Collaboration Skills Discussion Assignment