Interpersonal Communication Limitations Essay

October 26, 2022

Interpersonal Communication Limitations Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Interpersonal Communication Limitations Essay

Preamble

As you study interpersonal communication, you begin to seriously understand that the skills learned in this course are useful for every aspect of your life. Truth. You will thank me later.

Communicating: Sending, Receiving, Interpreting Information

There are several factors that will affect how messages are sent, received and interpreted. As you have been reading in your text as well, we explore words and then a lot more than just words in interpersonal communication.

We also focus on things like tone, volume, accents, clothing, environment, gender, age, socio-economic status, demographics, etc. These are all factors that will impact communication. While there are several factors that could be problematic in this video, I encourage you to explore only the communication factors as you respond to this question.

Instructions: Watch these videos and answer the questions. You must watch each video to the end.

Video #1: This video is about communication and miscommunication

https://youtu.be/gCfzeONu3Mo – How miscommunication happens – Katherine Hampsten

Video #2: This video is about workplace communication

https://youtu.be/o7_vGlWqgdg – Office Jargon by Nina Millns

Question 1:

What are some of the factors in this communication [message sending/receiving/interpreting] that were problematic and could affect the way these parties communicate and therefore their interpersonal relationships? Identify 5 factors and then explain them.

Grading: This assignment will be graded solely on the number of factors that you identify and explain.

You must explain each factor thoroughly (everything) to get the full points.

Partial points will be awarded for partial explanations.

Each factor that you identify (and explain) is worth 5-points.

Worth: This question is worth: 25 points.

Instructions: Please watch these videos and answer the questions. You must watch this video to the end.

Video #3: This video is about how we communicate. How to communicate strategically

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGeHS4jO0X0 – It’s Not Manipulation, It’s Strategic Communication

Question 2: Think interpersonal communication, then answer these questions:

What were some of the most informative and instructive pieces of information you learned about communication from this video?

Explain each piece of information, including why YOU found them personally informative and instructive? What about YOU that make these instructive?

Please remember that the points come from both identifying these points and making your answers thoroughly relate to both Interpersonal Communication as well as YOU.

Worth: This question is worth: 25 points.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met