Interpretation of Assessment Data

Interpretation of Assessment Data

Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839

Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages: 5-10

Instructions:

Assignment

Communicating Results

??

Instructions

Review the Unit learning resources prior to completing this assignment. In this assignment, you will create a 15 – 20 minute video communicating the results of the assessments you have taken for your Personal Assessment.? In the video, you will need to cover five areas as if you were reviewing the results with yourself.? Each of these areas is explained in detail in Stretch (2016).

Check in with self

Structure for the Interpretation

Review the results

Integrate the Results

Plan for the future

In your video, pretend you are speaking with a client. While you may have notes to use while speaking with a client, you would not read directly from a script. ?Practice communicating the results with someone prior to recording and feel free to have someone to whom you can speak with if that helps make communicating the results feel more natural.?

Upload your video to YouTube as an?unlisted video?on YouTube.? Submit the link to your video in the comments section of your assignment submission by 11:59 PM CT on Sunday of Module 6.

?

Resources

Communicating Assessment Results

?

Harvey, V. S. (2013). Communicating test results. In K. F. Geisinger, B. A. Bracken, J. F. Carlson, J. C. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise, … & M. C. Rodriguez (Eds.),?APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 2: Testing and assessment in clinical and counseling psychology?(pp. 35-50). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14048-003

?

Example interpretation

?

You should have 16 questions that you ranked yourself as 1 through 5.?

1. Sum the responses on items 1, 5, 9, and 13 (self-awareness).?

2. Sum the responses on items 2, 6, 10, and 14 (internalized moral perspective).?

3. Sum the responses on items 3, 7, 11, and 15 (balanced processing).?

4. Sum the responses on items 4, 8, 12, and 16 (relational transparency).?

5. Sum the responses on all items (authentic leadership).

?

The 1st summation will give a total score for self-awareness. lets say you had all 5s on #s 1, 5, 9, and 13, your raw score for self-awareness is 20.

?

The 2nd summation will be your raw score for :??Internalized Moral Perspective:______?

3rd will be for: Balanced Processing:______?

?

4th is: Relational Transparency:______?

?

5th is: Authentic Leadership:______

?

By comparing your scores on each of these components, you can determine which are your stronger and which are your weaker components in regard to your overall authentic leadership score. You can interpret your authentic leadership score (the total score) using the following guidelines: very high = 64-80, high = 48-64, low = 32-48, and very low = 16-32. Scores in the upper ranges indicate stronger authentic leadership, whereas scores in the lower ranges indicate weaker authentic leadership.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Interpretation of Assessment Data

Interpretation of Assessment Data

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!