Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Cultural Interview
Each student will identify and interview someone from a different culture than themselves. The student chooses to define what “different” looks like and may be based upon any number of things (i.e. ethnicity, race, religion, class, gender, age generation, sexual orientation etc.).
· The interviewee can be a patient, neighbor, fellow student, or co-worker.
· Use the interview questions are located on BlackBoard, under assignments, INCLUDE a copy of all questions asked of the interviewee with submission of your assignment
· In addition to answering the questions, the following will be used to grade the project:
3. Interviewee is from a different culture than the student,
3. Follow- up or probing questions are asked to encourage dialogue and a shared learning about cultural differences
3. Traditions are explored in detail
3. Student learning is highlighted in a 1-2 page double spaced essay in APA 7th format. APA format includes title page, pagination, appropriate margins, appropriate in text citation, appropriate font, appropriate reference format as well as correct spelling and punctuation.
3. At least two scholarly reference are included and pertains to the nurses role in working with clients from different cultures.
3. Your essay should address the following: one section including a comparative analysis or interpretation of your culture and your interviewee’s culture discussing the various attributes and what you learned from them. The other section should focus on how you will apply/integrate what you learned from your cultural interview experience into your professional nursing practice.
3. Cultural Interview Questionnaire
3. Tips for Maximizing your Cultural Interview
3. Cultural Interview Grade Rubric
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analyze the Water Footprint Results