Interviewing and Gathering Insights: An Ethnographic Approach
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Interviewing and Gathering Insights: An Ethnographic Approach
Select a person with whom you are going to interview. You will approach someone who you know.
Think about what you want to learn about the person and create a list of 5 questions that you are going to use as prompts. Review what Cashman is saying about using good prompts. Good prompts help you and your interviewee develop meaningful conversations.
Explain to the person that you are going to interview that you are interviewing the person for your class assignment. Think about this process as getting an unofficial consent from the person. Please make sure that they agree with you to share the conversations between you and them (interview results) with me.
Set up a time for your interview.
Conduct a 30-to 60-minute interview. Take good notes (utilize your filed note-taking skills that you have gained from the first and second Ethnographic Investigation projects.) You are not including transcripts in your paper but you still need good notes.
After coming back to your desk, review your notes. What information do you have in your notes? Remember, anthropologists try to understand culture holistically.
Information about your interviewee
Information about when, where, and how you interviewed the person
Write the stories you have listened to during the interview
New things about the person that you have learned from this project
A thoughtful reflection of your interview experience.
Interviewing and Gathering Insights: An Ethnographic Approach
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |