Invention Of Watermills And Roman Civilization Questions
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Invention Of Watermills And Roman Civilization Questions
3 questions
You should not need to spend more than two hours in total on this assessment exercise.
1.What difference did the invention of watermills make to Greek and Roman civilization?
2.Why does the archaeological site at Abu Hureyra matter for the history of energy transitions?
3.What do you think is the biggest single advantage of an agricultural lifestyle as opposed to relying only on foraging, and what is the single biggest disadvantage?
4.How do the changes in energy technology that we have looked at so far seem to have been related to changes in human diseases?
5.Is it important to understand the “fall” of the Roman empire? Why?
6.How does an understanding of the available energy technologies help us with the history of a complex pre-industrial society such as Classical (5th and 4th century BC) Athens?
7.How, and how far, does Hesiod’s Works and Days support Ian Morris’s arguments about the values held in farming societies?
8.What were the most important contributions, in energy terms, that non-human animals made in pre-mechanised agriculture?
Invention Of Watermills And Roman Civilization Questions
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow