Irvine Trolley and Time Travel Problem Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Irvine Trolley and Time Travel Problem Essay
Write an essay of about 4 pages (or 1000 words). Your Essay 2 is due at 11am on Thursday, February 25 , 2021.
Writing in your own words, address the following instructions.
In this essay you consider two very different types of “paradoxical” situations. The Trolley problem poses a moral dilemma: what should one do when moral intuitions seem to conflict? The Time Traveler problem poses a metaphysical quandary: how shall we understand whether time travel is really possible when intuitions about space-time seem to conflict? In both cases we reason by thought experiment.
Part A. Choose one of three scenarios we have studied: (1) the trolley Driver, (2) the trolley Bystander, both from Judith Jarvis Thomson’s “The Trolley Problem” (1985), or alternatively (3) the Tesla Driver, from our variation in Lecture, where a human Tesla Driver is in charge. Does this scenario pose a moral “paradox” where two principles are in moral or practical contradiction? If you find two conflicting moral principles, briefly explain each, and how they conflict.
Part B. Consider a scenario drawing on David Lewis’ “The Paradoxes of Time Travel” (1976). Suppose a traveler leaves a place in 2021 and arrives by time travel at a place in 2016, where she meets herself and has a conversation with her prior self about whether to go to UCI or UCLA in 2018. Consider Lewis’ metaphysical principle that this traveler S is really a “streak” through time: a person S enduring through time and composed of temporal parts S-at-2021 and S-at-2016. Now, as we live our lives it seems rather that “I” (S in the first person) am meeting a different person “I” at an earlier time in “my” life. Does this self-conversation scenario pose a metaphysical “paradox” where these two considerations are in contradiction about reality? Is time travel possible?
Part C. Very briefly: Should we think of the Trolley puzzle and the Time-Travel puzzle as varieties of “paradox”? If so, what kind of contradiction is involved in each?
SOURCES: Use ONLY the assigned texts, Professor’s Notes, and your TA guidance.
The aim is to think about these styles of paradoxes. There is a huge amount of literature on all these themes, but you may get confused or even misled by reading around, and the aim here is NOT a “report” but an exercise in your own thinking carefully about the issues raised in our Lectures and Discussion sections in relation to just these sources.
Irvine Trolley and Time Travel Problem Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow