ISOL 536 Cheque Deposit Activity Diagram Paper

September 16, 2022

ISOL 536 Cheque Deposit Activity Diagram Paper

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

ISOL 536 Cheque Deposit Activity Diagram Paper

Topic/Question: If the maker of antivirus software wants to be successful, the software has to be as close to bulletproof as the maker can possibly make it. Nothing is perfect; we certainly should understand at this point that no software can be proven bug free and that no security posture is 100% risk-free. Based on this statement, what do you think it could be better to improve the antivirus software? How safe do you feel to use antivirus software in your organization, and what other precautions do you use to prevent virus, malware, etc.?

Correlation vs Identity Discussions Replies

Correlation vs. Identity Discussion Prompt Reply to each Peer

Correlation vs. Identity Discussion Reply 1 Paolo:

Excellent post!

This topic was a bit confusing for me to understand in the beginning and your post gave must needed clarification on the difference between correlation and identity. Indeed, the fallacy stems from confusing a correlation with identity, however, it is still not clear cut where the separation ends. It is easy to confuse the two concepts when making a statement, what strategies can you suggest to mitigate this?

Regards,

Paolo

Correlation vs. Identity Discussion Reply 2 Melissa:

Correlation, relationship between two events or variables. Identity, relation of any event or entities with itself. While reading a few posts during this discussion prompt I feel that we answer the next question on its own. What is the importance of being able to distinguish between the two? As we read our class mates posts or comments, I think we all can say that between these two terms it can be extremely confusing. Making the importance of being able to tell them apart just that more important.

Ex.

Every dog bark, but not all dogs have the same bark.

Moore, B. N., & Parker, R. (2017). Critical Thinking (12th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met