Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
IVF NFP debate assignment questions
Read and look at the lessons & materials early in the week to assist you in answering questions and completing your task (s).
Read Catholic Health Care Ethical and Religious Guidelines (6th ed.). (2018).
Sections 38, 39, 42, 43, 44, 52
3 IVF Week – ECTOPIC – NFP.
Supporting procreation October 2007 2007
Watching in-vitro (IVF) and NATURAL FAMILY PLANNING (NFP) Cioffi, A. (2021 Feb 13). NFP Ectopic_
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrYSeYzDpSE (Links to an outside website.)
Respond to the following after studying the course materials found on Module 4: Lecture Materials & Resources:
Bioethical study and description of: pre-implantation Diagnosis of genetics PGD
Motherhood Surrogate
“Babies Snowflake”
Factory insemination
What is NFP? Natural Family Planning?
Describe the 3 primary symptoms of ovulation.
Describe the 7 symptoms of secondary ovulation.
Describe several protocols and approaches currently accessible.
Describe a number of ways that NFP is healthier than contraception.
NFP’s bioethics assessment as a means and as an aim.
Read the ERD paragraphs #: 38, 39, 42, 43, 44, 52 and summarize them.
Submission Instructions:
The paper is straightforward and brief and students lose marks for inappropriate grammar, timing and misprinting.
If references are needed, please refer to the current APA style correctly. Please refer to your curriculum or contact your instructor.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analyze the Water Footprint Results