Janus vs AFSCME and Public Workers Comparative Essay Solution

Janus vs AFSCME and Public Workers Comparative Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Janus vs AFSCME and Public Workers Comparative Essay

The Supreme Court of the United States heard the arguments in the case of Janus vs. AFSCME. This case was argued before SCOTUS in 2018. Your Term Project is to

Research aspects of the case; Janus vs. AFSCME.

1) Know the type of union being discussed. Detail the advantages and disadvantages of this type of union membership.

2) Determine the benefits and challenges for each side, Janus and AFSCME.

3) Understand and explain how the Abood vs. Detroit Board of Education, established a law which maintained precedence since 1977.

4) Research and discuss any additional historically cases which have challenged or supported the 1977 decision.

5) From your research and course learnings determine which side, Janus or AFSCME you support. Do you agree or disagree with the courts decision in the case, why or why not?

Your term project is to prepare arguments in defense of your chosen side, Janus or AFSCME. Detail whether the Abood vs. Detroit Board of Education law should have been upheld or overturned. What would be the impacts of upholding the 1977 decision? What are the impacts of overturning the 1977 law? Chose the side based on your own beliefs, which may not align with the courts rulings.

This is the final project for this course. Therefore, your Term Project should demonstrate a mastery of the complete coursework during the semester. Additionally, the project should be a reflection of your own original work. It should not contain more than a 30% similarity with Turn It In. Failure to submit your own original work will result in failure.

Paper should be 3-4 pages (not including reference page) typed and double spaced utilizing 12 point font. Sources must be cited.

Attached as Word document.

Rubric

HRPO 1305 (1)

HRPO 1305 (1)
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionIntroduction of topic to be discussed. Ability to grab readers attention. Provide thesis statement	5.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks	5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHistorical Application of the CaseBackground information – 1) thoroughness and accuracy of research 2) Demonstrate understating of complexity of facts and ability to relay facts in organized format	10.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArgument1) Detailed supporting or opposing position. Effectively detail reason for your stance 2) Historical view and future implications 3) Clarity of argument	25.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks	25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionEffectively summarize discussed points Clear reflection of thesis statement	5.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks	5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationReadability, overall clarity, proper use of grammar, and use of citations	5.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks	5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationThe project should represent your original work. It should not contain more than a 30% similarity with Turn It In. Failure to submit your own original work will result in failure.

Janus vs AFSCME and Public Workers Comparative Essay

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!