Judicial Review American Politics Paper Essay

March 3, 2022

Judicial Review American Politics Paper Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Judicial Review American Politics Paper Essay

Topic: The Judiciary

Guiding Questions:

Briefly Explain the concept of judicial review

What are two methods that have been recommended in the past 20 years for improving the ideological balance of the court?

Do you think that the court should be restructured to minimize the effect of ideology?

Briefly look over the entire question, watch for the key words,”compare, discuss.”

Major points of the readings are going to be very needed. Explained very clear, and interpret details of the theory. Give positive and negative aspects.

The answer should meet the questions points. Critical thinking is must, look for connections between reading and the questions. There more will be said as well all the readings will provide.

The answer range might be 450-550 words and (it is depends) a lot of how you answer it, grammar must be well written to understand the answer.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met