Kenya’s foreign debt crisis

Kenya’s foreign debt crisis

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Kenya’s foreign debt crisis

Kenya’s foreign debt crisis can be traced back to the 1970s and 1980s, when the country borrowed heavily from international lenders to fund large-scale infrastructure projects and other development initiatives. By the 1990s, however, Kenya’s economy was struggling, and it became increasingly difficult for the government to service its debt.

In the early 2000s, the situation came to a head, as Kenya’s debt-to-GDP ratio soared to over 100%. This was due to a combination of factors, including low economic growth, high interest rates, and a significant devaluation of the Kenyan shilling. The government was unable to make debt payments, and Kenya’s credit rating was downgraded to “junk” status by international ratings agencies.

The crisis was exacerbated by a number of external factors, including the global economic downturn that began in 2008 and the rising cost of oil. These factors led to a sharp decline in tourism, one of Kenya’s key sources of foreign exchange. In addition, the country was hit hard by a severe drought that lasted from 1999 to 2000, which led to crop failures and food shortages.

In an attempt to address the crisis, the government of Kenya implemented a number of austerity measures, including cuts to public spending and the sale of state-owned enterprises. The government also sought assistance from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other international organizations, which provided loans and other forms of support. However, these measures proved to be insufficient, and Kenya’s debt continued to climb.

The foreign debt crisis had a devastating impact on the Kenyan economy and people. Unemployment rose, and many people were pushed into poverty. The crisis also led to a decline in public services, including healthcare and education, as well as a decrease in the number of government jobs. The government’s ability to invest in infrastructure and other development projects was also severely constrained.

In recent years, the government has made some progress in addressing the debt crisis. The IMF approved a new loan program in 2016, which helped to stabilize the economy and reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio. The government also implemented a number of structural reforms, including the liberalization of key sectors of the economy and the introduction of a new tax system.

Despite these efforts, Kenya’s foreign debt remains a significant challenge. The government continues to spend a large portion of its budget on debt servicing, leaving little room for other important priorities such as poverty reduction and economic growth. In addition, Kenya’s economy continues to face headwinds from external factors, including the ongoing effects of the global economic downturn and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which has hit the country’s tourism and other key sectors hard.

In conclusion, Kenya’s foreign debt crisis was a result of a combination of factors, including poor economic management, external factors, and a series of external shocks. The crisis had a devastating impact on the Kenyan economy and people, and the government continues to struggle to address the problem. Despite some progress in recent years, Kenya’s foreign debt remains a significant challenge, and addressing it will require a combination of short-term measures to stabilize the economy, and long-term measures to support sustainable economic growth and poverty reduction.

Kenya’s foreign debt crisis

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!