Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
Argumentation Elements in General Points to Remember: Evidence in Support:
Thesis Employees and employers who work more than 8 hours should be required to take mandated breaks in all states. Meal breaks are required in only 20 states.
*Rest periods are required in only nine states.
I. The Beginning Long shifts should require required breaks for managers and employees in all states. Some states allow for rest or lunch breaks, but if your employer doesn’t want to, you won’t get one. Taking a break to refresh the body is beneficial to productivity, focus, and movement.
B.Chignell is a British author (August 27th, 2019)
(Five Advantages of Regular Workplace Breaks) https://www.ciphr.com/advice/taking-breaks/ https://www.workingamerica.org/fixmyjob/workingconditions/no-breaks
Who do you want to reach out to? Employees, Congress, and Business Owners
What method will you use to present the problem to them? By demonstrating how breaks will benefit both workers and the company.
II. Overview of the Issue Health, Working Long Hours, and Employer Refusal are three key elements to describe the dilemma. Examples
*The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a federal wage and hour legislation, does not require employers to give food or rest breaks. The right of an employee to take food and rest breaks is governed by state law. L.Guerin, J.D.
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/meal-rest-breaks-rights-employee-29773.html What impact does the problem have on various community stakeholders? When employees don’t take enough breaks from work, their productivity, mental health, and overall work performance suffer.
Employees that are overworked frequently experience chronic stress, which can easily lead to job burnout. While this has a detrimental impact on employee health and well-being, it also has a negative impact on the bottom line. (paragraph 2 of Kohll’s book) A.Kholl(May,2018) (A new study finds a link between employee engagement and the long-forgotten lunch break.) https://www.forbes.com/sites/alankohll/2018/05/29/new-study-shows-correlation-between-employee-engagement-and-the-long-lost-lunch-break/#488944024efc
III. Proposal for a Solution Who will be in charge of putting the solution into action? Legislators and the state labor department are on the same page. What impact will the change have on the community?
Employee productivity will rise, as will their mental health. What proof do you have that this is the best option? Employees were less productive after not taking lunch breaks, according to a Tork US vs. Canada Take Back Lunch Breaks poll. https://cdntorkprod.blob.core.windows.net/docs-c5/763/185763/original/tork-takes-back-survey.pdf
IV. Opposing viewpoints Audiences who may have misgivings or experience unfavorable outcomes as a result of the suggested solution: Employers and employees who believe their compensation will be cut. Concerns to be addressed include: Both mental and physical wellness are important. In response to those issues, I provide the following rebuttal: N/A
Final Thoughts Breaking up long shifts is good for the mind, body, and business. As you wind up the argument, what crucial elements do you want to emphasize? Breaks aren’t meant to deplete your bank account; rather, they’re meant to re-energize you so that your focus is sharper.
Last words to the audience: Research your state’s regulations regarding workplace breaks.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Key Points of the Argument in General |
Key Points of the Argument in General