Knowledge Management System Essay Assignment Paper

Knowledge Management System Essay Assignment Paper

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Knowledge Management System Essay Assignment Paper

CMPT SUBJECT.

Assignment #2: Knowledge Management System (KMS)

Situation:

Continuing with the situation found in Assignment 1 – Part 1, your team has won the contract to plan, oversee, execute the digital transformation at the organization. The CEO believes that the first task is to introduce a Knowledge Management System (KMS) into the organization. As with all capital intensive I.T. projects, there needs to be research and understanding of how this project will impact the department, organization, and customers.

Part 1:

The CEO wants to understand the scope of Knowledge Management System impact to the organization.

1)What change management process would be used to implement the KMS?

• 2) If the organization had to choose a department to start the KMS deployment, which department would be the best choice? Given that the team does not know anything about the state of the departments, what kind of characteristics of process, people, customers within a department indicates an urgency to launch KMS in that department?
• 3) What kind of training plan is needed to help employees engage with the KMS?

4)What are some of the associated costs with KMS implementation? Provide an overview of the costs ranging from capital costs, training costs, and other associated costs.

• 5) Any other important facts, issues, or challenges the team thinks the CEO needs to know.

The project will be written in APA 7th edition format.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517715604

Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2020, Vol. 35(21-22) 4517 –4532

© The Author(s) 2017 Article reuse guidelines:

sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/0886260517715604

journals.sagepub.com/home/jiv

Article

Prevalence of Elder Polyvictimization in the United States: Data From the National Elder Mistreatment Study

Joah L. Williams, PhD,1 Elise H. Racette, MA,1 Melba A. Hernandez-Tejada, DHA,2 and Ron Acierno, PhD2,3

Abstract Elder abuse, including emotional, physical, sexual, financial, and neglectful mistreatment is widespread in the United States, with as much as 11% of community-residing older adults experiencing some form of abuse in the past year. Little data exist regarding the prevalence of polyvictimization, or experience of multiple forms of

abuse, which may exacerbate negative outcomes over that of any one form of victimization in isolation. This study evaluates the prevalence of elder polyvictimization among a nationally representative sample of community-residing U.S. older adults. Data from the National Elder Mistreatment Study were examined using bivariate and

logistic regression analyses. Approximately, 1.7% of older adults experienced past-year polyvictimization, for which risk factors included problems accomplishing activities of daily living (odds ratio [OR] = 2.47), low social support (OR = 1.64), and past experience of traumatic events (OR = 4.81).

1University of Missouri–Kansas City, USA 2Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA 3Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA

Corresponding Author: Joah L. Williams, Department of Psychology, University of Missouri–Kansas City, 5030 Cherry St., Rm. 310, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA. Email: williamsjoah@umkc.edu

715604 JIVXXX10.1177/0886260517715604Journal of Interpersonal ViolenceWilliams et al. research-article2017

https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/journals-permissions

https://journals.sagepub.com/home/jiv

mailto:williamsjoah@umkc.edu

http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1177%2F0886260517715604&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2017-06-23

4518 Journal of Interpersonal Violence 35(21-22)

Elder polyvictimization is a serious problem affecting community-residing older adults with identifiable targets for intervention.

Keywords elder abuse, adult victims, sexual assault, domestic violence

Elder abuse and mistreatment are widespread problems in the United States, with as much as 11% of community-residing older adults aged 60 years or older experiencing some form of abuse in the past year (Acierno et al., 2010). Most widely accepted definitions of elder abuse include five categories of mistreatment: emotional/verbal abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, finan- cial exploitation, and neglect (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016).

Such abusive acts against older adults are associated with a number of serious mental and physical health problems, including depression, anxiety, fractures, malnutrition, and early mortality (e.g., Dong, 2005; Dong, Beck, & Simon, 2010; Dong et al., 2009; Dyer, Pavlik, Murphy, & Hyman, 2000). Although the full economic impact of these injuries is unknown, estimates for these multiple forms of elder abuse (e.g., physical, financial, psychologi- cal, sexual, neglect, etc.) have been reported to cost Americans well over US$10 billion dollars annually (White House Conference on Aging, 2005), with financial abuse adding another US$2.9 billion to the cost (MetLife Mature Market Institute, 2011).

There is evidence that many victims of elder mistreatment will experience multiple forms of abuse, or polyvictimization. Ramsey-Klawsnik and Heisler (2014) define elder polyvictimization as

multiple co-occurring or sequential types of elder abuse by one or more perpetrators, or when an older adult experiences one type of abuse perpetrated by multiple others with whom the older adult has a personal, professional, or care recipient relationship in which there is a societal expectation of trust. (p. 15)

Similarly, the U.S. Department of Justice (2015) defines elder polyvictimiza- tion as the co-occurrence of multiple forms of abuse. An important area of overlap worth noting here is that both definitions of elder polyvictimization involve the co-occurrence of multiple forms of abuse. Thus, for the purposes of this study, we define elder polyvictimization as the co-occurrence of dif- ferent forms of abuse and mistreatment.

Conceptually, the polyvictimization framework has the potential to facili- tate major advances in the study of elder abuse. That is, examining single types of victimization in isolation may fail to capture the complexity of

Williams et al. 4519

victimization experiences for many older adults and lead clinicians and/or researchers to inappropriately attribute distress and functional impairment to a single type of victimization rather than the cumulative burden of victimiza- tion (Hamby, Smith, Mitchell, & Turner, 2016). Indeed, polyvictimation may well increase risk for a number of poor physical and mental health-related outcomes above and beyond experiencing any single type of victimization.

For example, in a sample of 54 confirmed cases of elder mistreatment reported to an Adult Protective Services agency in Virginia, older adult vic- tims of hybrid financial exploitation, or financial exploitation that co-occurred with physical abuse and/or neglect, were less likely to be healthy and more likely to fear their abusers than older adults experiencing financial exploita- tion in isolation (Jackson & Hafemeister, 2012).

Moreover, the magnitude of financial loss was substantially higher for those victims of hybrid financial exploitation (victims of hybrid financial exploitation lost on average US$185,574 vs. US$79,422 among victims of financial exploitation without other co-occurring forms of victimization), highlighting the need to better understand risk factors for elder polyvictimization.

Indeed, only a few studies have explored rates of elder polyvictimization among community-residing older adults, and these rates vary substantially by region and other sociocultural factors. For example, in a sample of 1,017 randomly selected elders aged 65 to 101 years who were enrolled in the Iowa Medicaid Waiver Program, 15.8% reported experiencing one type of abuse, 4.0% reported experiencing two types of abuse, and 1.0% reported experi- encing three types of abuse (Buri, Daly, Hartz, & Jogerst, 2006).

In another study involving 129 people with dementia and their caregivers (Wiglesworth et al., 2010), researchers found that 47.3% of these older adults had been abused in the past year; of this group, 31% experienced multiple types of mistreatment (of note, all of the adults who were physically abused in the past year in the sample also experienced psychological abuse, neglect, or both).

More recently, high rates of polyvictimization were observed in a sample of Latino older adults aged 66 years and older in low-income, minority areas in Los Angeles, such that an astonishing 21% of these older adults had experi- enced multiple forms of abuse in the past year (DeLiema, Gassoumis, Homeier, & Wilber, 2012). It is not clear, though, that these prevalence esti- mates are representative of the general population of older adults in the United States, given that no studies to date have looked at rates of elder poly- victimization among a nationally representative sample of U.S. older adults.

Abroad, studies have also yielded variable prevalence estimates of elder polyvictimization in the community, and, importantly, some of these interna- tional efforts have included estimates derived from nationally representative data. In a community-based sample of Dutch older adults in Amsterdam, for

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Knowledge Management System Essay Assignment Paper

Knowledge Management System Essay Assignment Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!