Kurt Jooss 1932 the Green Table Video Response Discussion
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Kurt Jooss 1932 the Green Table Video Response Discussion
https://www.3cmediasolutions.org/privid/72160?key=477e339718d0356d4f04b2f361c5c5eb32ae852b (Links to an external site.)
PART ONE:
Watch the above piece and review the details about it below. (this video you should have already watched, but posted here just in case you didn’t yet.)
The Green Table (1932)
Choreography by Kurt Jooss
Music by Fritz CohenThe Green Table is a pacifist work depicting the inhumanities and corruption of war. It was created in 1932 for the International Competition of Choreography in Paris, where it
won first prize.
PART TWO:
After watching the video, describe what you saw AND connect it to today. Make sure you include details about movements, costumes, story, and more. There is no wrong way
to respond as long as you are describing AND then connecting it with your thoughts of the world today. HINT: We are not in the same war state as when this piece was created
but what challenges are we facing today in the world that could be related to this work ( a dance piece is called a work)? How does the movements/dancing show the story or
themes in the piece?
Your response should be a minimum of 6-8 sentences in paragraph form but can be longer if needed. Please use correct grammar in your response.Kurt Jooss 1932 the Green Table Video Response Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Kurt Jooss 1932 the Green Table Video Response Discussion
Kurt Jooss 1932 the Green Table Video Response Discussion