Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Lancashire Preston Construction Site Visit Report Paper
In this assessment, the students are requested to visit any Construction site and submit a report of around 1400 words by including the following aspects.
Construction site hazards
Waste disposal procedures of Construction site
HSE Control measures, safe working practices in Construction site
Required Regulatory legislations on Construction site
conclusion
Reference – Harvard style
China and its Great Wall Discussion
Week 4 Discussion
“China and its Great Wall” Please respond to the following, using sources under the Explore heading as the basis of your response:
*Please be sure to avoid comments on the current Southern Border/Mexico of USA. This is a highly controversial subject and your comments may be taken out of context and appear as harassment of another student. Any comments about the Southern Border/Mexico will be immediately removed with loss of points.
Explore
China and Its Great Wall
Chapter 7 is the chapter to find the answers to the discussion.
Explore wall interactively by searching online for the Great wall of China
Format for answering questions:
Hello Class and Dr. C, here is my main post for the Week 4 Discussion, I hope you enjoy it
1. Two interesting facts about the Great Wall
This part is pretty easy just assess any of the following such as facts about its size, length, purposes, varied materials, labor force, and its phases of construction
Be pretty specific here, don’t just list a fact, but also assess why you think these facts are impressive or cool in paragraph form. Would you want to own the company that can build these kinds of wall?
2. What was the purpose of the Wall and how successful was it?
This part requires a bit of thought. Walls are much more than just physical barriers, they also mark clearly defining boundaries for cultures and they are also symbolic and psychological barriers as well. Think about how the ancient Chinese felt when they saw this Wall as well as how outsiders (particularly the Mongols) felt about seeing this. Did it signify the superiority of China? Did it mark a clear line between civilized society and barbarians?
3. Are backyard fences good examples of modern day privacy walls? Y or N or maybe? Why? (your opinion)
Format for Responding to Classmate
Hello (Name of Classmate), Great Post!
I really enjoyed reading your post. One of the things I find interesting is:
The reason it is of interest is:
Why do you think….? (ask your classmate a question pertaining to the post)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Lancashire Preston Construction Site Visit Report Paper |
Lancashire Preston Construction Site Visit Report Paper