Laureate: Angus Deaton “For His Analysis Of Consumption, Poverty, And Welfare
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Laureate: Angus Deaton “For His Analysis Of Consumption, Poverty, And Welfare
Task 1
Write and present a short piece on one of the Nobel Prize Laureates in Economics (specifically, of the Sverige Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel).
Written Part:
Format: 12 pt. font, Word or pdf file (typed; only graphs can be drawn by hand).
No cover page, please. Provide proper headings, etc. Spacing: 1.5. Length: 2 pages, including references.
Content:
Advice:
Start by looking at the Nobel Prize Committee’s website www.nobelprize.org (Links to an external site.) (press release, advanced information, etc.), explore the laureate’s website (if available), and then pick one of the research articles, read it carefully, and conduct more research on it. Make sure to carefully read the posted grading rubrics provided under the respective submission links.
Here are some questions for you to consider when preparing your paper and presentation:
1) What is the question/ are the questions the laureate is asking in her or his work?
2) Why do we care?
3) What are the contributions? (That is, what do we know after the research that we did not know before? Or, in other words, what is the big deal?)
4) What are the answers?
Laureate: Angus Deaton “For His Analysis Of Consumption, Poverty, And Welfare
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |