Leadership and Decision-Making Approaches and Ethics in Music

August 2, 2022

Leadership and Decision-Making Approaches and Ethics in Music

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Leadership and Decision-Making Approaches and Ethics in Music

The company working on is establishing my own recording studio

For your assignment this week, let’s revisit and build upon your leadership and decision-making plans and approaches to date. Please be sure to thoroughly address the following in at least 1750 words.

Revisit your goals and objectives—how have they changed and evolved since the beginning of the course? With respect to proactive planning, how can you envision them continuing to change and/or evolve?

Describe how you plan to address your leadership and decision-making approaches in order to accommodate these changes and refinements.

Keeping your awareness and concern of business evolution and ethics in mind, how does sustainable development come in to play in your plans?

Please identify and describe how cultural awareness and civic engagement efforts in which your business will be involved, and the desired (potential) outcome of these cultural awareness and civic engagement efforts –please identify at least two (2) examples. How do these efforts align to the corporate mission, vision, and improve corporate exposure and profits? What will be the intrinsic and extrinsic rewards for your company if the company implements the ideas in this CSR addendum?

As in other industries, many of the interactions between industry companies (labels, publishers) and artists are governed by their contractual agreements and correlating responsibilities.

Do you feel that it is necessary for industry leaders to be subject to a ccc

Leadership and Decision-Making Approaches and Ethics in Music

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met