Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Leading Population Health Promotion
Many people will benefit from the DNP scholar’s efforts to promote health and enhance outcomes. Consider the following questions as you consider your future career as a DNP scholar.
On a local, national, or global scale, identify one evidence-based strategy for leading efforts to achieve optimal health for populations.
Describe one evidence-based method for driving population healthcare reform efforts across and within healthcare systems.
Describe one initiative that aims to improve population health. How will you contribute to the program’s success?
Instructions:
Use an APA 7 style and a word count of at least 200. At least three (3) scholarly sources should be used to back up your claim. The scholarly source must meet the following criteria: 1) be evidence-based, 2) be scholarly in nature, 3) be no more than five years old (published within the last five years), and 4) provide an in-text citation. When information is summarized/synthesized and/or direct quotes are utilized, APA style requirements apply, and citations and references are supplied.
Textbooks aren’t regarded as academic sources.
Do not utilize Wikipedia, Wikis,.com websites, or blogs.
Lectures
https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Leading Population Health Promotion