Learn to Excel Grant Proposal

June 4, 2022

Learn to Excel Grant Proposal

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Learn to Excel Grant Proposal

Post your Grant proposal to this discussion forum as an attachment in a word document or pdf file and also copy and paste the content in the message box.

Due Thursday at 1159 pm, CST

Grant Proposal Justification – Justification statement for a grant proposal related to your annotated bibliography. For an ‘item’ related to or in support of one’s professional field. (Example: Why funding should be granted to purchase heart-rate monitors for physical education classes), Derived from topic researched in an annotated bibliography.

Pattern of development: Persuasive; problem-solution
Length: 3 pages, single-line spacing (Not including Cover, Contents, and Reference Pages)
Includes at least 5 in-text citations (APA format)
Utilizes at least 5-7 sources which must be appropriately cited in a reference list (APA format)

Use the information presented in the 9.1 Powerpoint presentation slides 2-19.

You may also use the link of the National Science Foundation.

https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpg_1.jsp#D3

/content/enforced/2965906-HSCI_315_1_202120/grant proposal template 40.docx

/content/enforced/2965906-HSCI_315_1_202120/grant proposal template 12.docx

/content/enforced/2965906-HSCI_315_1_202120/grant proposal template 221.doc

Learn to Excel Grant Proposal

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met