Lobbyists Impacts on Public Health Policy Discussion Questions

October 25, 2022

Lobbyists Impacts on Public Health Policy Discussion Questions

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Lobbyists Impacts on Public Health Policy Discussion Questions

I’m working on a health & medical multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

What are lobbyists? How might they impact public health policy? Give an example of one you believe has had a positive impact on public health policy.

How can individuals influence the development of public health policy? Provide at least three examples.

What are special interest groups, and how are they formed? How might they impact the development of public health policy?

Explain the role philanthropic organizations can play in the public health policy process. Name at least one organization in particular, and describe how they influenced the development of at least one public health policy.

Lobbyists Impacts on Public Health Policy Discussion Questions

HS 312 Regression Analysis Tests Discussion

Instructions

Using the Library, identify a peer-reviewed study that uses a statistical analysis, such as regression, ANOVA, or t-test.

In a report, briefly summarize the study, paying particular attention to how it uses inferential statistics. Describe the test and how it is applied to the study. Break down the test into smaller steps. Identify each step and describe the purpose of each step. Finally, explain why this test was appropriate for the study purpose.

Lobbyists Impacts on Public Health Policy Discussion Questions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met