Local Public Media Project Review Assignment

October 6, 2022

Local Public Media Project Review Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Local Public Media Project Review Assignment

With hundreds of public radio and television stations around the country able to serve local communities, there are numerous organizations doing innovative and engaging initiatives. Here are four examples of recent public media initiatives.

The assignment is to link to these four web sites and read about these initiatives. After you’ve reviews these, find ONE local community engagement initiative from a public tv or radio station and answer the questions below.

In Rural Nebraska, Combating Hunger Requires All Hands On Deck

How giving parents cameras helped KPCC/LAist tell a different kind of pandemic story

Black In Appalachia

Public Media campaign on mental health launches with focus on youth

Assignment instructions:

Pick one public media initiative to review. Please do some googling to find an initiative if you can; if not, I have some suggestions for some local public media initiatives here for you to choose from the document that I uploaded.

1 – Pick an initiative

2 – Read about the initiative and learn as much as you can about it.

3 – Answer the following questions

What is the initiative? Explain it’s mission or purpose.

Who are the organizations that have created the project?

What city or town is the project focused on?

if the information is available, who funds the program?

Who is the audience the program serves? Describe them.

What kind of impact and public service does it provide?

Describe your overall thoughts about the program? What are several things you like about the project?

If you were responsible for the project is there anything you would add or do differently?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met