Logical Problem of Evil, Premises Through Conclusion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Logical Problem of Evil, Premises Through Conclusion
Sketch out the logical problem of evil, premises through conclusion.
What is the greater-good defense?
What is the free will defense?
“The success of a nauseum inference requires that it be reasonable to presume that we would be able to see X if X were to actually exist.”
What does this mean?
How does it relate to the author’s response to the problem of evil?
How does the distinction between fully human and merely human help resolve the apparent inconsistency of Christ’s incarnation and dual nature?
What are five philosophical presuppositions that are necessary in order to do modern science? And why is science unable to ground them?
According to the textbook, why is Hume’s argument against miracles guilty of circular reasoning?
What are the six essential historical facts (data points) that are best explained by the bodily resurrection of Jesus as given in the chapter. Explain how a bodily resurrection explains these data points better than alternative explanations.
Do you agree that all humans possess an internal sense of the divine (senses divinities)? Why or why not?
What do you think is the strongest argument for the truthfulness of Christianity as presented in this chapter?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Logical Problem of Evil, Premises Through Conclusion
Logical Problem of Evil, Premises Through Conclusion