Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Los Angeles Yale Global Warming Six Americas Discussion
For this science communication project, we will be examining Yale’s project. Based on surveys, social scientists determined that there were six definable categories that the American public fit within in terms
of their views of climate change. Part 1: You will be choosing one of these “Americas” and writing a letter (about 500 words) to someone in this audience focusing on a climate change topic we have covered in
the class so far. The topic can come from one of the chapters in our text, one of our articles or films, or from a topic from a student oral presentation.(you can choose a film named Chasing Ice, and something
about big melt as your topic) Your objective will be to educate and persuade the person in your audience to take action. Part 2: Please reflect on the categories of Yale’s Project and discuss what you see as
strengths and limitations of the Project (about 250 words.) Los Angeles Yale Global Warming Six Americas Discussion
That file is some information about big melt and Chasing Ice. but remember you have written a letter to someone to in order to persuade he/she take some action about this topic( big melt or chasing ice)
Los Angeles Yale Global Warming Six Americas Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|