Management and Leadership Importance Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Management and Leadership Importance Assignment
Short Paper: (Week 6)
The topics of management and leadership are important to a healthy and productive organization. Students will write a paper focused on the human side of management and leadership using information from the course material, plus any supplemental material provided to you or from your own research.
By completing this assignment, students will meet the outcome(s):
- identify the critical business functions and how they interact in order to position the organization to be effective in the current business environment
- explain the importance of the integration of individuals and systems to organizational effectiveness
- describe the ethical and social responsibilities that confront a business
Required Elements of the Short Paper:
- Identify the aspects of the human side of management and leadership that you value from the readings; •Explain why you value these aspects;•Apply the material learned in the course to support the reasoning of why you value these aspects.Required Formatting of Paper:
- This report should be double spaced, 12-point font, and two to three pages in length excluding the title page and reference page;
- Title page;
- Use APA formatting for in-text citations and a reference page. You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary;
- Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.
criteria outstanding superior Good substandard Failure Critical Thinking/Reasoning 7 points demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; provides thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions
5.95 points shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions
5.25 points shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion
4.55 points shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions
3.85 points lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims
Application of Concepts/Development 7 points arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts
5.95 points arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts
5.25 points arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material
4.55 points arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material
3.85 points a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not exist
Attention to Instructions 3 points demonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignment
2.55 points demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment
2.25 points demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment
1.95 points failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment
1.65 points did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements
Clarity; including grammar 2 points writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability
1.7 points most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues
1.5 points wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar
1.3 points unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues
1.1 points largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure
Adherence to APA style (6th ed.) 1 point no APA style errors
0.85 points attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present
0.75 points attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document
0.65 points attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other
0.55 points no attempt at APA style
Overall Score Outstanding 18 or more
Superior 16 or more
Good 14 or more
Management and Leadership Importance Assignment
Management and Leadership Importance Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow