MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
Ethics Case
Spring 2022
Jessica has just been hired as the Payroll Manager at Murdock Cable Company. The company
employs 52 people primarily from the neighboring community. She was welcomed to her new
position by the General Manager, Greg (her immediate supervisor) and Walter, the company
owner. Jessica’s first impression of the company is that it is a welcoming environment with
professional people who are friendly. Walter told her to see him if she has any questions or
problems.
Greg, the General Manager who hired Jessica, informed her of the need to maintain strict
confidentiality regarding employee salaries, pay scales, and commissions. The previous Payroll
The manager was terminated after disclosing certain payroll information which violated the
confidentiality guidelines.
After four months of employment, Jessica began to wonder why one technician (Mark) made so
much more in commissions than the other service technicians. She assumed that Mark was
highly experienced, qualified, and exceptionally diligent. She overheard Walter commending
Mark on his performance on several occasions. She noticed that Walter, Greg, and Mark often
have lunch together.
Work tickets are randomly assigned to technicians. When a technician completes a job, the next
ticket from the dispenser should be taken. Technicians do not have the option of selecting their
work tickets. As the Payroll Manager, Jessica is responsible for loading the work tickets in the
dispenser. She receives the work tickets from Greg.
One day, Greg gives Jessica the stack of work tickets for the service technicians for the
upcoming week. As required, Jessica loads the tickets into the dispenser. She returns to Greg’s
office and sees him giving Mark a separate stack of work tickets. Now Jessica understands why
Mark’s commissions are so high; that Greg is giving the easier, high-commission work tickets to
Mark. After some investigation, Jessica discovers that Mark is Greg’s brother.
Jessica is contemplating what to do. Since she has only been at the company for a short time, she is
still on probation. This is her first job since college.
REQUIRED:
Below are questions that may help guide your discussion. The following questions are not in any
particular order. The questions are a guide to help stimulate your thoughts. A sentence or two
answering each question is insufficient.
opportunity for fraud?
Submission
on all sides. Use the page break feature and include a reference page.
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |