Marco Polo Bridge incident from the Chinese

Marco Polo Bridge incident from the Chinese

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Marco Polo Bridge incident from the Chinese

Find two response sources for the Marco Polo Bridge incident from the Chinese and Japanese government or public media. The sources should from the period from 1920-1950. Then compare and analyze the sources and answer these questions. 5 pages.

Marco Polo Bridge incident from the Chinese

1. Author: Who is the author? What is their background? How might their background influence their perspective?
2. Audience: Who is the audience for the piece? How does the type of audience impact the ways in which the product takes shape?
3. Purpose: Why was the piece produced? Is the piece effective in achieving its purpose? What factors help it and what factors hinder it?
4. Tone and Language: What is the tone of the source? How is the tone and the language related to its overall purpose? What can the tone tell us about the author or his/her relationship to the audience?
5. Significance: This is the most important element of your analysis. Why is this source important? Why should scholars use this source when making historical analyses? What can this source tell us that other types of sources might not be able to do?
6. Marco Polo Bridge incident from the Chinese

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Marco Polo Bridge incident from the Chinese

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!