Matrix of Risk Probability Picnic at the Office Every Year

July 16, 2021

Matrix of Risk Probability Picnic at the Office Every Year

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Matrix of Risk Probability Picnic at the Office Every Year

is a demonstration of your understanding of how to apply the risk matrix to your project’s risks.

You must create a list of at least ten identified risks from your project for this assignment. After you’ve finished your list, make a risk matrix to indicate the probability and impact of each item.

As previously suggested, please use explicit if/then sentences. The risk and its influence on the project should be addressed in the if/then expressions. During the assessment, this will aid in evaluating the probability and impact levels.

For each of the ten hazards identified, a template has been provided, and the following should be addressed:

Risk ID is a number that denotes the level of risk.
A clear if/then statement is a risk statement.
Probability is the likelihood that a risk will occur (Can use high, medium, low or numeric system).
Impact: The project’s impact as a result of the risk (Can use high, medium, low or numeric system).
Overall Score: This is the final ranking score used to evaluate where each risk ranks in relation to all others.
After you’ve examined the hazards, you’ll need to rank them in order of significance. This is useful in the actual world, since it prepares you for the following step, and it is a crucial understanding to have when dealing with risks.

Matrix of Risk Probability Picnic at the Office Every Year

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met