Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The length of response will vary, depending on the nature of the question. Written responses will be assessed based on the Grading Key for Written Responses Q&A PDF and the Writing and Q&A Guidelines and Requirements PDF. All of the responses must be evidence-based upon the content in pages presented in this module; evidence must be cited and students shall NOT write opinions or interpretations of their own.
An EXAMPLE of a written response that meets expectations:
Question:
Discussing the works You’re Fine, You’re Hired, Five Day Forecast, and Waterbearer, what are two interpretations offered in regards to Lorna Simpson’s intentionally cropping or concealing of the face of the black woman subject(s) in her work?
Written Response:
One interpretation which considers Lorna Simpson’s intentionally cropping or concealing of the face of the black woman subject(s) in her work is that Simpson is aiming to permit the woman subject to expand into a larger, shared identity –rather than one single women in the “You’re Fine, You’re Hired” work –as well as to expand or create a larger dialogue between the art work and viewer (Study Guide Lorna Simpson, pg. 02).
Another or second interpretation which considers Simpson’s intentionally cropping or concealing of the face of the black woman subject(s) in her work is that Simpson is aiming to suggest that the woman retains some small or modest degree of control (Study Guide Lorna Simpson, pg. 02). This is described by contemporary art critic Holland Cotter as the black woman’s effort to own her thoughts and own her history (pg. 02). It applies even when the women’s history is heartbreaking, or when her willingness to engage is devalued, as can be seen in “Waterbearer” (pg. 02).
Another EXAMPLE of a written response that meets expectations:
Question: In the 13th Century Japanese painting Six Persimmons by artist Mu Qi, why are the composition arrangement and use of ink both important attributes of Zen Buddhist style?
Written Response: In the 13th Century Japanese painting Six Persimmons by Mu Qi, the simple composition arrangement emphasized the importance of meditation and simplicity in Zen Buddhist life –in contrast to 17th Century Dutch artist Jan Davidsz de Heem’s sumptuous still life painting A Table of Desserts (Lazzarri, pg. 141). Furthermore, the use of ink reflects Zen Buddhists’ preference for spontaneity and simplicity, rather than the lushness of oil painting, as seen in de Heem’s lavish Table of Desserts (pg. 141).
IMPORTANT:
Students must please submit this assignment and all assignments as an uploaded file in MS Word doc / MS Word docx format. Formatting of MS Word doc submissions must adhere to the guidelines and examples shown in the previous module 01 part B. Students are expected to always refer to the introductory module pages Required Formatting for Written Submissions.
There will be a 25% grade deduction for any MS Word file submission that is not correctly formatted, which is explained in one of the pages of the the Modules 01 Part B, and which includes double-spacing and including the question as well as the response.
PLEASE REMEMBER TO DOUBLE-SPACE MS WORD DOC !
1.How did Maya Lin develop her proposal for the Vietnam War Veterans Memorial? Please provide a detailed response, including her background research, site visit(s), and conceptual thinking.
2.How did How did Maya Lin explain the relationship between the physical design of her memorial and its meaning? Please provide a detailed response, including evidence from her proposal/ proposal statement accompanying her design for the memorial competition.
PLEASE REMEMBER TO DOUBLE-SPACE MS WORD DOC !
3.Why was the Vietnam War considered to be was such an unpopular war? Please provide a detailed response with historical information and specific reasons for protests against the war, and provide evidence from the study guide provided in this Canvas module.
4.How did the public view Maya Lin’s design for the memorial? Explain multiple specific examples of people’s reactions expressed, either positive or negative reactions.
PLEASE REMEMBER TO DOUBLE-SPACE MS WORD DOC !
PLEASE REMEMBER TO DOUBLE-SPACE MS WORD DOC !
there is one more reading need to read but it is too big to upload
you can download in http://docdro.id/JhfEYmt
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |