Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
MFT 5106 Critiquing and Utilizing Quantitative Research Paper
Persistent Inequalities in Our Society and Social Movements
Explain what are some of the persistent inequalities within our society and how are they connected to limiting citizenship and all of its rights.
Explain how have citizens fought for their rights though aspiring social movements, altruistic social movements, and restrictionism social movements.
MFT 5106 Critiquing and Utilizing Quantitative Research Paper
This week, you will need to local three quantitative studies related to your PCF. Each study should address a research topic that can be used to inform clinical decision making with regard to your PCF. After identifying these three studies, write a brief 1-paragraph description of each quantitative study that includes the general focus of the study, what type of quantitative design (survey, experimental, etc.) was used in the study, and its applicability to your PCF. Be sure that you also include an APA 6th edition citation for each article.
Similar to last week you will need to email your studies and completed descriptions to your instructor so that he or she can provide guidance on their suitability for the second part of this assignment. After corresponding with your instructor about the studies, select one of the studies
MFT 5106 Critiquing and Utilizing Quantitative Research Paper
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
MFT 5106 Critiquing and Utilizing Quantitative Research Paper |
MFT 5106 Critiquing and Utilizing Quantitative Research Paper