Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
1- The outline directions, Primary Task Response: This week’s Discussion Board assignment will be a review of other students’ drafts of the Key Assignment.
The Key Assignment is given in the work description for Unit 5 Individual Project.
The first thing you should do is provide a clear overview of your Unit 5 IP to the discussion area so that other students can look over it. Attach your paper to your main discussion post, along with any other notes you think are relevant. This assignment’s goal is to assist you improve the quality of your Key Assignment. 1
2- A list of the project’s instructions.
Important Task
Choose an actual fast food company to work with for this task.
(Your chosen company) has just hired you as its new vice president of strategic planning. The company’s recent performance, as well as changes in business and economic situations, will be a major emphasis of your new position.
The chief executive officer (CEO) to whom you report has already given you permission to engage a staff of recent Master of Business Administration (MBA) graduates to aid you in your efforts, given the size of the firm and the fact that it is in a highly competitive field. You recently finished the hiring process and hired four persons with little to no real-world business experience.
You and your team will be developing an entirely newand, presumably, more effectivestrategic plan in the coming months. You intend to start with a kick-off meeting with your team.
The length of the deliverable should be between 1,000 and 1,250 words.
You require each member of your strategic planning team to prepare a condensed version of the major aspects of a strategic plan in order to be confident that they comprehend all you’ve taught them. You assign each employee the task of preparing the following sections of a strategic plan for the next 3-5 years for the company:
Statements of Mission and Vision (It’s not permissible to simply replicate an existing genuine company.)
Goals & Objectives that are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, and Time-Bound (SMART)
Analysis of the Industry
SWOTT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats, and Trends)
Perceptual Mapping
Select any plotting criteria that you believe are important.
Explain why you choose the criteria you did.
Your objective is to produce a plan that follows the same specifications and will serve as a model for your staff’ submissions.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
MGMT 455 Taco Bell’s Strategic Planning Report |
MGMT 455 Taco Bell’s Strategic Planning Report