Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
MGMT4450 of Nebraska at Omaha RED Notice Negotiation
SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
Please provide the following information for your submissions:
— Movie/Series/Program name
— Year/Season & episode number
— Start/End time of the scene
— A paragraph describing the “scene setting” (who/what/where/when/why)
— 2-3 paragraphs describing the NEGOTIATION CONCEPTS illustrated
— (HELPFUL) A link to the IMDB page for the movie/series/program… and/or a link to a video of the scene itself.
— (EVEN MORE HELPFUL) Have your submitted scene cued up on your computer to share.
*** IMPORTANT: Please TRY to make sure the scene content is “PG-13!”
(Minimal foul language, illegal/illicit activities, violent situations, etc.)
OTHER IMPORTANT EXCLUSIONS
You may NOT use a scene that has already been submitted by another student in this class!
— It is YOUR responsibility to check all video discussion posts for uniqueness!
You may NOT use any scene from the following list of movies:
— The Godfather Trilogy (Links to an external site.) (1972/1974/1990) [These are WAY over-analyzed online!]
— The Wolf of Wall Street (Links to an external site.) (2013) [Language is inappropriate!]
— The Negotiator (Links to an external site.) (1998) [Instructor will use scenes from this later!]
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
MGMT4450 of Nebraska at Omaha RED Notice Negotiation |
MGMT4450 of Nebraska at Omaha RED Notice Negotiation