Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
MGT 301 Organizational Behavior Case Study
Reference Source:
Textbook: –
Colquitt, J. A., LeVine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2021). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (7th ed). Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Case Study: 1
Case: ACCENTURE
Please read the case “Accenture” from Chapter 2 “JOB PERFORMANCE” Page: – 50 given in your textbook – Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (7th ed). by Colquitt, J. A., LeVine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2021) and answer the following Questions:
Assignment Question(s):
Part: -1
1.Describe the major strengths and weaknesses of Accenture’s new system of providing employees feedback about their job performance. (02 Marks) (Min words 150-200)
2.Identify types of job performance that Accenture’s new system of providing performance feedback would best account for? Which types of job performance that might be overlooked? Explain. (02 Marks) (Min words 150-200)
3.Describe jobs or job contexts where a performance management system like the one Accenture replaced might be more appropriate? Explain. (Min words 150-200)
Important Note: – Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
Part: -2
Discussion question: Page: – Please read Chapter 2 “JOB PERFORMANCE” carefully and then give your answers on the basis of your understanding.
Important Note: – Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
Case Study: 2
Case: MARRIOTT
Please read the case “MARRIOT” from Chapter 9 “PERSONALITY AND CULTURAL VALUES “Page: – 292 given in your textbook – Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (7th ed). by Colquitt, J. A., LeVine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2021) and answer the following Questions:
Assignment Question(s):
Part: -1
1.Can you think of other jobs in Marriott where Big Five dimensions other than agreeableness and conscientiousness would be vital? (02 Marks) (Min words 150-200)
2.If you applied for a job that involved a personality assessment, would you be honest in your responses or would you exaggerate your answers to appear more desirable? Why? (Min words 150-200)
3.What other approaches might companies use to assess personality during hiring, other than an interview or assessment? What strengths and weaknesses might those other approaches have? (Min words 150-200)
Important Note: – Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
Part: -2
Discussion questions: Please read Chapter 9 “PERSONALITY AND CULTURAL VALUES “carefully and then give your answers on the basis of your understanding.
4.Assume that you applied for a job and were asked to take a personality test, like the one offered by Kronos. How would you react? Would you view the organization with which you were applying in a more or less favorable light? Why? (Min words 200-300)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
MGT 301 Organizational Behavior Case Study |
MGT 301 Organizational Behavior Case Study