Microsoft’s Response to COVID-19: Remote Work and Technology Solutions
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
.Microsoft’s Response to COVID-19: Remote Work and Technology Solutions
Microsoft’s response to COVID-19 has been centered around remote work and technology solutions. The company quickly transitioned to a remote work model for its employees and encouraged its customers to do the same. To support remote work, Microsoft has provided tools like Microsoft Teams, which allows for virtual meetings and collaboration, and Windows Virtual Desktop, which enables secure remote access to company resources.
Additionally, Microsoft has worked to support healthcare organizations and researchers in their efforts to combat COVID-19. The company has offered free access to its healthcare chatbot service, which helps individuals screen themselves for COVID-19 symptoms, and has provided Azure cloud computing resources to researchers working on developing treatments and vaccines.
Microsoft has also contributed to COVID-19 relief efforts through charitable donations and partnerships with organizations like the United Nations Foundation and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Overall, Microsoft has leveraged its technology expertise and resources to support individuals, businesses, and organizations in navigating the challenges presented by the pandemic.
Microsoft’s Response to COVID-19: Remote Work and Technology Solutions
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow