Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Midterm Discussion of Two Juvenile Justice Theories
Research Paper: Midterm Discussion of Two Juvenile Justice Theories Assignment Instructions
Overview
This assignment is a comprehensive review of the analysis of two theories chosen to discuss and how the theories relate to the six bullet points below. The authors of Juvenile Justice: A Guide to Theory, Policy and Practice discuss the four main theories (in chapter four) that have been developed that attempt to explain offenses by and against juveniles.
Please choose two of these theories to analyze against one another. As you write your essay answer this series of questions (create sub-headings for the series of questions below): Social Disorganization Theory, Deterrence Theory or any two theories from page 4 of the book.
· Explain each theory.
· What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?
· What is the relationship between the theory and practice?
· Is there any evidence to support the theory and delinquency causation?
· How is the theory critical to the understanding and control of delinquency?
· Which theory do you think does the best job of explaining the causation of delinquency and why?
Instructions
Your essay discusses the above and also aligned with the below criteria too:
· The length of your assignment is 10 pages.
· This assignment requires a title page, abstract, reference section, all of which are not included in the page count.
· Your essay format is APA
· See the assignment rubric for further details of assignment including reference requirements.
· Peer-reviewed scholarly resources (should be within five years when possible).
· Assignment must be submitted as a Word document.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Midterm Discussion of Two Juvenile Justice Theories