Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Military in Nigeria Case Study Assignment
hey there, how are you doing? hope good? So, I just head back from my supervisor and had few comments which were:
1: at the ending page of chapter four where we have the table “Synopsis of military op in NE Nigeria” that instead of the little summarization I had below, that I needed to explain the synopsis properly.
2: Also, that I needed to properly include the case study section in the introductory section.
3: He said the big and only issue was still with the case study: He said I haven’t spoken on the counterinsurgency deficiencies of the Nigerian armed forces enough, that the case study mainly contained SAF. That I’m to speak in details about the deficiencies of NAF counterinsurgency operations and areas where it has failed to engage local actors (communities).
He said I had to have a more methodological comparative study, that it had to be in a sequential form.e.g like where we talked about recruitment in SAF below that had to be a follow up of NAF recruitment too. That it has to be a concrete comparative work which at the end I’d be able to draw up a chart and say these factors or areas which the NAF didn’t do is a reason why their counterinsurgency efforts a failing whereas SAF did and it’s working.
That I’m to demonstrate that these deficiencies in engagement of local actors and other aspects affects the overall efforts of cmr. The essence of this is that if I were to draw up a chart, I could clearly show that the deficiencies in here and here is the reason for why X is like this and Z is like this and so on. That this would clearly show the methodological and structural nature of paper and also show concrete arguments.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Military in Nigeria Case Study Assignment |
Military in Nigeria Case Study Assignment