Minority Women in Texas in Seeking a Career Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Minority Women in Texas in Seeking a Career Discussion
Question 1:
Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:
- Describe qualitative and quantitative research methods.
- What is the purpose for each method?
- What might be some challenges in using each method?
Question 2:
Visit ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
- In the search bar, type in a keyword or phrase related to your topic and check the “Doctoral dissertations only” box.
- In the left-hand margin narrow the Publication date to the last 5 years.
- Locate one qualitative and one quantitative dissertation.
Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:
- Describe how a doctoral researcher justified the chosen research method in their dissertation.
- Provide a discussion on the method you are proposing and why that method might be the best approach.
Provide appropriate citations and references formatted according to APA guidelines.
Minority Women in Texas in Seeking a Career Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow