Modulating Between Emic and Etic Perspectives
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Modulating Between Emic and Etic Perspectives
Using the aids available in the classroom and in the APUS/AMU Online Library Graduate Studies Center, compose an essay of a minimum of 500 words, justify the formal third person style required in academic writing in general and in the APA style in particular. Provide an explanatory example of how writing in the formal third person differs from writing in the more informal first/second person styles. Submit in the form of an essay in APA style including a title page and three references. Ensure that the references are from peer-reviewed journals, government sources, other appropriate academically acceptable sources, or some combination thereof.
Formal third person is a form of writing that is basically in a third person’s point of view.
All students should be
The perspective of the writing plays an integral role in crafting the voice of the writing, modulating between emic and etic perspectives (Onwuegbuzie & Johnson, 2006). When writing, the audience is not always aware of the material that is being covered. In order to alleviate any confusion that the reader may have it is imperative to not mix points of views, therefore writing strictly in third person will eliminate any room from reader error. In regards to writing there are three forms of writing known as first person, second person and third person. In academic writing third person is the most preferred style of writing, because third person style of writing enhances the credibility of writing.
There are a variety of reasons why
References
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. Qualitative Report, 11, 474-498.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Modulating Between Emic and Etic Perspectives